LANDMARK LITIGATION
Welcome to Landmark Litigation by Lee Phillips
Legal Practitioners' interested in the prepared briefing documents are required to Login to our web site (see right); authorisation can be provided by contacting privacy@landmarklitigation.com. The Case Overview - Short Summary is the main briefing document to the case, which be downloaded, click here. No registration or tracking is employed for accessing our documents.
Welcome to my Web Site
My
name is Lee Phillips, I have a dispute with the Family Court of
Australia /Brisbane and now seeking redress to right a horrible
wrong and gross injustice
a denial of fundamental civil and human rights by court
counsellor Mr Christensen, the OPPORTUNITY to reconcile the Phillips
marriage which, gave rise to an
unlawful divorce
in defence of divorce, custody, and migration applications to NZ by
Mrs Phillips in Nov 1989.
This WORLD First civil
and criminal tort against court counsellor/ social worker Mr
Christensen, as a condition precedent to the Dissolution of Marriage
s48 and Family Report - in an admission at court
“no i have not” (p40,41 t’cript) pursuant to Rules of
Court s123(h),failed an...‘investigation’...of
court evidence including Mr Phillips ‘pleadings
of reconciliation’
recorded to the Report p3
which, gave rise to a ‘defended’
divorce application pursuant to s48(3).(see Abbott and Abbott Fam CA
5;(1995)FLC-92-582(6Feb1995) in the full bench; para 64.
Mr
Christensen proceeded to Absolute in wilful blindness to s55A,
custody proposals of each party;
misled the court in
custody evidence p1 para1 Family Court;
s55(2)-(5)[Appeal]
undiscovered unreported perjuring child access affidavits x2 in Mrs
Phillips which, gave rise to the rescission of the decree in FLAct
s58 - no’s4,5,6. Chronology of doc’s Green lever file;
including Guidelines for the Preparation of Reports 1987-’91
Validity of the Report
p4,5,22 (black dossier), gave rise to an
unlawful divorce
24July1989 - 99days prior to
trial, including an
Invalid Family Report.
The Phillips children 7
and 9 yrs relied on their parents and Court officials to protect
their rights and act in good faith.
This website has been
designed to inform the Australian public that they too, have
undeniable civil and human rights in this
no fault court and can
challenge unlawful
incompetent decisions resulting in personal impact and losses.
Purpose of this web Site
-
To attract legal professionals to mount litigation, seeking compensation for the injustices perpetrated against me and Phillips family members.
-
To consider other individuals who may have experienced similar failures by this Court who are unaware of their rights and position.
-
To inform the Australian community about their RIGHTS in a NO FAULT Family Court, including strict obligations to the Family Law Act '75 towards fellow families, applicants and defendants.
What will you find on this site?
Various pages on this site provide further evidence to support our allegations and to provide basic guidance to those affected individuals with similar court experiences (or components), to take steps to redress these injustices..
Key pages for the reader
| About the Law | About the applicable law in this litigation; mainly the Family Law Act 1975 |
| The Case | Details about this litigation. The main briefing document Case Overview - Short Summary of the case, can be downloaded by clicking here. |
| Index to Brief / Document Library | Complete set of Court Documents to this action, relevant Sections consolidated CCH Aust.10th. Edition FLAct to Nov 1989 see navigation menu at top of page, Click Index to Brief / Document Library Document No16 Chronology of Documents. |
| * see Doc 12. Case Overview - Short Summary - Main briefing document. | |
| * see Doc 13. Case Overview - Detailed |
Phillips & Phillips (son)
v
Court Counsellor, Family Law Court of Australia, Brisbane
This world first civil and
criminal
Tort
to
challenge social worker/court
counsellor Mr Christensen
who, in an admission to court,
failed an ‘investigation’
of ALL court evidence,
including Mr Phillips ‘pleadings
of reconciliation’ which, pursuant to FLAct s48 (3)
Likelihood of the resumption of cohabitation; gave rise to a ‘defended’ divorce.
Prima facie, this is an admission which, if
acted on in a material way by the court (and evidence suggests that
it was), gives rise to a grave breach of duty resulting in an
unlawful divorce and accepted subsequently, the sworn
evidence of Mr Christensen which amounts to a serious professional
breach of duty of care owed to all parties in the proceedings and
which has denied Mr Phillips any OPPORTUNITY pursuant to FLAct s43
to reconcile the marriage.
Absolute declared unlawfully 24July1989 -
99 days before trial - incl’ an
Invalid Family Report 8Sept1989.
Justice Elliott (dec.)
proceeded to judgment
extempore 2Nov1989 in the presence of Mrs Phillips child access
lies rather than the truth in Mr Phillips evidence. (see - Reasons
for judgment “Her
application is bona fide”.p8,10).
Court incompetence, how far does it go ?
As a self acting defendant Mr Christensen denied my civil rights, and the civil rights of my children, pursuant to duty of disclosure documents (Rules of Court s123 para (b) ...manner of service of process...
A joint investigation of the Phillips file B4218/87on or about Sept2009 with a Brisbane barrister confirms the file is void of any such entry. (see Breach1 Case Overview - Short Summary Home page click here
Login
Navigating to a number of our web pages is protected and requires an initial logon. Please contact Lee Phillips for an authorised Userid and Password via email privacy@landmarklitigation.com or call mobile: 0413.225.445. Please enter the provided Userid and Password at the screen prompt.
Check the box "Keep me signed in on this computer unless I log off" to maintain a record of your user details on your PC for future logins.